Wednesday, March 23, 2005

participants: me, a reporter; venue: a teahouse; time: several years ago

me: your report of that company damaged its image in the public, it is even more unfortunate that your reporting is not balanced, you proved that their new model didn't work and thier CEO was responsible for the failure, but you didn't indicate the birght sides of their endeavor

reporter: we are only responsible for the part we report, we don't have the resources and time to find ALL related materials, as far as what we report is correct, that's OK

me: but you know that firm was greatly affected by your imbalanced reporting, what do you think?

reporter: i don't know. it's beyond my capability and responsibility to take care of the companies i report. i think best way to be responsible for the public is to reveal the truth, even it's only part of the whole picture.

me: part of the whole picture is usually misleading.

reporter: the public should have their sources to find the rest of the whole picture.

me: so you mean a lot of the hassles those companies encounter are not because of a single media, if they could find another media to report their "bright sides" of the testing, their image won't be damaged in the public.

reporter: exactly right.

this conversation is about the level 2 problem, but the question is, even we have 2 newspapers, they usually report the same issue from a similar perspective and usually reach the same conclusion, this is what i mean when i am talking about level 3 problem.

related link:

the media storeis i experienced

posted @ 8:59 PM

via: baidu search

baidu launched some new services, one of them will tell you what are chinese netizens serching for, here is it (in chinese).

the moving list on the right side tells you what people are searching for RIGHT NOW, some random selections from the list are as fellows:

- girlfriend got married, but the bridegroom is not me

- china blog

- king of gettting a name for baby

- train tickets booking

- english chatroom

- tianjing business school

- mouse loves rice, english version

- death

- "half life II" strategy (a computer game)

the top 10 list is as follows:

- mp3

- beauty

- novel

- qq (an instant message tool)

- music

- sex

- pic

- fortune-telling

- who on the earth do you love?

- NBA

this is really boring, i think the most interesting list is the "top 50 of moving up", this tells something of the trend.

posted @ 8:27 PM

via: xinhua net, read the news here: Rules issued to ensure fair journalism

story 1

"When we do a press conference in Beijing, we give every journalist who shows up a 200 yuan “transportation reimbursement”. I use quotation marks because you have to labor mightily to roll up even a 50 yuan taxi fare in Beijing, and the average ride probably sets you back 20. Clearly, it ain’t all going to transportation."          via: image thief

this is too familiar to many company marketing guys in china. in order to have favorable media publicities, many companies have to bribe journalists in various ways, bribery include "reimbursement", "new years party", "luxury items", "daily consumption card", "transportation card", "performance tickets", etc. if you don't bribe when you "should", journalists will impose sanctions against your company, in some disgusting cases, journalists will report your company in a negative way.

story 2

one reporter of a popular shanghai evening newspaper never have dinner with the host company, usually after he collects the "transportation reimbursement", he will go to the next "dinner party" to collect the next "transportation reimbursement". he is notorious in the business because he usually fail to write the articles he promised, so many company marketing guys don't invite him any more.

story 3

many swindlers take advantage of this media corruption for their business, here is a black humor story i experienced last year.

story 4

a friend of mine told me how to deal with one of the most prestigious business newspaper in china - first, smile to them but avoid offering any company information to them, and second, occasionly do some advertisment with them. according to my friend, their advertisers have never been reported negatively, and those who never advertise with them have the highest chance to appear in their spotlight.

story 5

another prestigious business newspaper in china, which also operates such a business called "soft article"(paid publicity reports), deliberately uses an english title - "advtorial" for their "soft articles", in this way, their readers won't understand that these "advetorials" are actually advertisements and will believe what these "advetorials" tell me.

story 6

many academic periodicals charge a "space fee" to those students or researchers who have academic articles to be published in their magazines. having found this is a good way to make money, some of them created "special editions" for such "academic articles".      via: 直面社科期刊

conclusions

1) there are three levels of media problems in china: first, media is polluted by money; second, media is restricted and not diversified; thrid, risk of "tyranny of the majority" in media

2) the most urgent issue that is relevant to many people's life is the level one problem

3) it seems to me that the purpose of the Rules issued to ensure fair journalism is to solve the level one problem, or at least part of its purposes. failing to understand this background and labelling the "rules" merely as a "cracking down" seems not fair and is a "one-dimension" thinking.

4) i don't think it will work, the solution exists not in the individual or organizational level

posted @ 1:24 PM