Wednesday, February 22, 2006

ichiro-san's question about history revisionism makes me think over the recent history revisionism in china. it happens only in recent years and is not a widely reported phenomenon, almost unnoticed in mainstream media.

KMT is portraited as an ally of the communists during the anti-japan war of WWII in china; in popular TV dramas, once demonized Chiang Kai-shik of KMT cried for the sufferings of the people, and western imperialist powers of the late 1900s are now believed to exert some positive influences on chinese society ... there are some radical thinkings and discussions taking place.

considering the important role of history view plays in shaping chinese's ideology, politics and approach to deal with other nations, the chinese history revisionim will have enormous influence someday in hte future.

posted @ 7:11 PM

via: massage milk

there is an article on Google in the next issue of Sanlian Life Weekly, look forward to reading it.

posted @ 12:00 PM

via: local16.com, tip by: peking duck

posted @ 9:00 AM

via: danwei

the final note is interesting but leaves a lot of open space for various interpretations. here is mine.

several years ago i was in charge of developing a sales team for a company since the original sales team was badly trained, rewarded and very corrupted. one guy suggested to hire new people and totally wipe out the original sales team, it was just too hard for those old sales persons to adjust themslves to the new sales system. the proposal resonated among many others.

however, it required a lot of money to disperse the old sales team and both money and time to build up a new one, what's more, such radical reform would without doubt create chaos and "instability" in the company.

china faces similar challenges in the past twenty years of reform and opening-up, during which old powers were gradually REPLACED by newly emerging powers, instead of being WIPED OUT by government before the new powers were developed.  especially in southern china, governments let the market mechanisms work and, by encoruaging new powers flourishing and competing with old powers, they did a great job in eradicating old powers without causing too much social unrest and pains.

enlightened by the Taoism philosophy of governing in southern china, i took a different approach and first developed a small and highly efficient new sales team, with better traidning and sales policies, they could sell much more than the old sale persons did and got much better rewards. those from the old sales team were kept with the original sales incentive policies but were quickly attracted to the new sales team. i set a few criteria for those who want to join the new sales team and as soon as they met the criteria they could join the new team. after a few month, most old sales persons were converted to the new sales team.

in some circumstances, i see a direct confrontation a better approach to solve problems, but to fight the internet censorship in china, the "Dao" approach has many merits.

posted @ 7:52 AM

a letter from a reader:

Dear BingFeng:

I felt compelled to respond to Ichiro-san's posts, and hope you are able to post my opinion.
Best regards
Momo
------------------------------------
You are right because a blog is a channel of personal expression and relief, so why should you not air your passions just because it is inconvenient and uncomfortable to some people?
Arabs use American products and Chinese use Japanese products, merely because these things facilitate the way they live, and are the better choice.
They don’t have to love America or Japan. But they don’t have to hate America or Japan either.
Did all Americans who voted for George Bush agree with him on every issue? Did you, Ichiro-san, echo Koizumi in every matter, when (and if) you voted for him?
We can disagree with issues. Many Chinese people, including Bingfeng, can (and should) continue to challenge Japanese revisionism because it is a moral issue of right and wrong, and dignity of the victims of the militaristic past embodied by those 14 criminals.
It isn’t just a tactical matter, as you so dismissively claim, just because the truth is too unpleasant to face.
I don’t know whether you are concerned or contemptuous. It is true that China is far behind the developed world still. But for a huge country not only to have endured 150 years of hardship but also feed and clothe its people today, and stand up on its feet before the world, is already a source of pride for Chinese people everywhere.
Yes, China has way to go before ``catching up’’ with Japan and the West.
Ichiro-san, can I ask you: can a country that is materially advanced - with bullet trains, world-class manufacturing and the most expensive designer shops  - take pride in itself, when it is morally recalcitrant?

Momo

posted @ 7:44 AM